Unique among unique. Is it genetically determined? (2008, Jul 28)

Unique among unique. Is it genetically determined? [Br J Sports Med. 2008] – PubMed Result <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18662936?dopt=Abstract>

Br J Sports Med. 2008 Jul 28. [Epub ahead of print]

Unique among unique. Is it genetically determined?

Gonzalez-Freire M <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Gonzalez-Freire%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Santiago C <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Santiago%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Verde Z <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Verde%20Z%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Lao JI <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Lao%20JI%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Oiivan J <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Oiivan%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Gómez-Gallego F <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22G%C3%B3mez-Gallego%20F%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Lucia A <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Lucia%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> .

Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain.

The cross-country World championship is one of the best models to study characteristics needed to achieve top-level endurance athletic capacity. We report the genotype combination of a recent cross-country champion (12km race) in polymorphisms of seven genes that are candidates to influence endurance phenotype traits (ACTN3, ACE, PPARGC1A, AMPD1, CKMM, GDF8 (myostatin) and HFE). His data were compared with those of eight other runners (World class but not World champions). The only athlete with the theoretically more suited genotype for attaining World-class endurance running performance was the case study subject. A favourable genetic endowment, together with exceptional environmental factors (years of altitude living and training in this case) seems to be necessary to attain the highest possible level of running endurance performance.

Gene doping could be next frontier for those seeking edge (2008, Dec 18)

Gene doping could be next frontier for those seeking edge

By A.J. Perez, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — From East German swimmers in the 1970s, to sprinter Ben Johnson in the 1980s, to clients of the Bay Area Laboratory Cooperative (BALCO) in recent years, athletes have sought an edge in a lab.
In the future, that lab might not produce a steroid or human growth hormone but genes that, for example, could alter the webbing of a swimmer’s hands and feet.

“We already have webbed hands and feet,” said Andy Miah, a lecturer at University of the West of Scotland. “It would just be a little bit more. What … could the world of sports do about that? Absolutely nothing, nor should they be able to.”

Gene doping, considered by many experts to be the next frontier for athletes seeking a biologic edge, was the central theme Thursday at a forum hosted by the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. The presenters agreed that doping on the cellular or molecular level likely is years away, and Miah was in the minority when it came to how it should be handled by sports governing bodies.

The World Anti-Doping Agency, which sets the rules on banned substances for Olympic sports, has outlawed gene doping — even though there’s no evidence it exists in sports, nor is there a test to detect it.

“It’s going to be difficult (to detect), but we will succeed in the long run,” said Theodore Friedman, a professor at the University of California-San Diego. “Whether WADA is ahead of the curve or not, time will tell. …You’re going to be looking for changes in a cell, not testing for a drug.”

Friedman said gene therapy is “an immature field” that’s had some “highly publicized setbacks” in treating disease. Still, U.S. Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart said it’s good that the topic is getting attention before it becomes an issue in sports.

“This discussion is miles ahead of where we were pre-BALCO, when people were questioning the need for out-of-competition testing or research,” Tygart said. “It would be naive to think the demand is not there. If you rely on the experts who study the issue, we’re still several years away from it being a legitimate risk.”

Edwin Moses, one of the best hurdlers in history, said athletes likely won’t look to gene doping until they’re forced to.

“Most guys are still going to be using the (usual) techniques,” Moses said. “They will continue to be doing it as long as there are no tests used to detect it. Some will always (cut corners). It’s like those who drink and drive and think they can get home without getting caught. Whether it’s drugs or cheating for an exam, there are always going to be people who cheat.”

Then there’s the even more far-reaching notion of prospective parents potentially altering embryos to bring out the attributes more likely to produce an elite athlete.

“The direct manipulation of embryos or fetuses is far off in the future,” said ethicist Thomas Murray, president and CEO of the Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute. “I can’t imagine finding a good argument for parents to be allowed to do that. But if they did it anyway, what would we do to their children? It’s a disturbing prospect.”

There are those who wonder if (gene) doping is OK (2008, Dec 18)

There are those who wonder if (gene) doping is OK
By HOWARD FENDRICH – 15 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) — Gather a roomful of anti-doping experts, administrators, academics and athletes alike — something a conservative think tank did Thursday — and there is no consensus as to whether gene doping, thought by some to be the next frontier in Olympic cheating, is at hand.
Indeed, there isn’t even consensus on whether it would be a bad thing.
Turns out there is a school of thought — “pro-doping,” it’s called — that suggests anything athletes do to improve performance is OK, even, for example, manipulating DNA or surgically enlarging the webbing between fingers and toes in order to swim faster.
So says Andy Miah, who teaches at the University of the West of Scotland and was among about 10 panelists who participated in Thursday’s conference on “The Coming Age of the Uber-Athlete: What’s So Bad about Gene Enhancement and Doping?” at the American Enterprise Institute.
Gene doping, which is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency, is a spin-off of gene therapy, which typically alters a person’s DNA to fight diseases.
Miah advocates “celebrating the value of performance enhancement,” he said.
“I don’t think a public health crisis would arise from enhancement technologies,” he added.
Miah said there is a growing group of professors around the world — “Four years ago, there were half as many people as now,” he noted — who back his “World Pro-Doping Agency” thought experiment. One of his premises is that sports wrongly are thought of as a separate entity, different from other pursuits or professions — music, art, medicine — where no one objects to, essentially, doing whatever one can to be the best one can be.
“We are more willing to embrace these enhancements, with the caveat that we need them to be safe enough,” he said. “We don’t all want to kill ourselves by using these things, but we are interested in exploring the realm of human embodiment that is beyond our current capabilities — and that might be cognitive, it might be physical. And I think that’s where sport isn’t quite at yet.”
Other speakers Thursday included Olympic champion hurdler Edwin Moses and U.S. Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart, who believe gene doping should be banned, worry what it could do to athletes — and agree someone is likely to try eventually.
“How do you feel if it’s your son or your daughter who wants to be an Olympian? Would you let your kid or your grandchild take what they have to take? Or do what they have to do?” Moses asked.
On the other hand, he acknowledged there are those who will.
“If you have experts saying it’s realistic to turn on pieces of your metabolism and it becomes feasible for the athletes to do something without killing themselves and it’s not tremendously expensive, someone is going to try it,” said Moses, who won gold medals in 1976 and 1984 in the 400-meter hurdles. “There will be someone who can convince an athlete they can get away with it.”
For his part, Tygart believes “that risk is several years away,” he said. “And even if it comes, there would be the ability to detect it through the testing process.”
There were others present who were not so sure about either of those assessments.
John Leonard, executive director of the American Swimming Coaches Association, told of conversations he has had with coaches and scientists in China.
“We are really naive if we are to believe that the Chinese at this point are clean or that they are the only country in the world that is experimenting with genetic enhancement as we speak,” said Leonard, who was not a panelist but attended the conference and spoke during question-and-answer periods.
“There are lots of countries in the world who couldn’t care less about doing it safely, and there are lots of athletes who will take the chance that they will die in order to win medals. … Will the United States have the same viewpoint when we start losing gold medals?”
Theodore Friedmann, a professor at the University of California, San Diego, researches human gene therapy and spoke about the risks.
“People are injured. People die,” he said. “It should be reserved for treatment of people with serious diseases.”
He said he doesn’t know whether there are athletes attempting gene doping.
“Nobody knows,” he said, before adding: “It wouldn’t surprise me.”
About one thing Friedmann left no doubt, however: Unlike Miah, he thinks the practice has no place in sports.
“The anti-doping world accepts the notion that rules matter and, in fact, it reflects the wish of most athletes,” Friedmann said. “The world of pro-doping is the contrary of all that.”

European sport ministers discuss ethics, gene doping (2008, Dec 19)

European sport ministers discuss ethics, gene doping
Published: Friday 19 December 2008
Ministers and other stakeholders acknowledge that there are corruption, match-fixing and illegal betting problems in sport and have asked the Council of Europe to tackle these and other emerging ethical challenges in sport, such as gene doping.
Sport representatives gathered for a Council of Europe conference on 12 December, adopted a package of three resolutions, including measures to address sports ethics.

The ministers “acknowledge that there is a problem of corruption, match fixing and illegal betting in sport and invite sports organisations to investigate the situation and, where appropriate, identify the problems”.

The Council of Europe is invited to draw up a draft recommendation which could form the basis of a new convention on these issues and help increase integrity controls.

In particular, the ministers ask the Council of Europe to address emerging challenges such as genetic engineering in sport.

Doping refers to the use of performance-enhancing drugs, which is forbidden by organisations that regulate sport competitions. It is widely seen as unethical by most international sports organisations as it damages health and undermines the equality of opportunity of athletes.

A major new ethical challenge in the fight against doping is the use of genetic engineering, declares the resolution.

Gene doping can enhance athletic performance without being detected in blood and urine tests. The issue is currently being addressed in bioethical debates about human enhancement.
“One of our main priorities should be well prepared to react quickly to new ethical challenges,” agreed Birgitta Kervinen, president of the European Non-Governmental Sports Organisation (ENGSO).

The resolution on pan-European sport cooperation invites the Council of Europe to consider ways of increasing its cooperation with the European Union.

“I believe that it is the clear interest of EU members and non-members alike to avoid any developments which would introduce duplication and weaken pan-European arrangements for a better and healthier sport across the continent and beyond,” said Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, deputy secretary-general of the Council of Europe.

The resolution on autonomy and sport reflects concerns that stakeholders have over the growing commercialisation of sport and the effects it has on the autonomy of sports movements.

Make me a superhero: The pleasures and pitfalls of body enhancement (2009, May)

Make me a superhero: The pleasures and pitfalls of body enhancement
We should welcome with open arms the rich possibilities of technologically enhancing our bodies. Just so long as we don’t all end up looking, and thinking, and acting the same

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/01/body-enhancement-cosmetic-surgery-genetics

WADA eyes research on gene doping (2009, Jan 16)

WADA eyes research on gene doping
DANIA BOGLE, Observer staff reporter bogled@jamaicaobserver.com
Friday, January 16, 2009

THE World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is investing lots of money and resources into conducting research into how to detect gene doping as it continues its fight against cheating in sport.

WADA programmes development manager, Tom May, made the revelation at the panel discussion on Drug Free Sport during the Jamaica Anti-Doping Agency’s two-day Symposium which wrapped up yesterday at the Knutsford Court Hotel in Kingston.

May spoke to advances in science which have already developed the ability to clone animals and possible future advances which might help dishonest athletes cheat.

Gene therapy already allows for the alteration of DNA to help the body fight certain diseases.

May explained that through gene doping an athlete could manipulate the body to grow bigger muscles or help them develop at a faster rate.

“We don’t think it’s quite in place but we don’t think we can wait for it to occur,” he said.

The WADA has already pumped close to US$8 million into the gene doping research.

Meanwhile, International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) Medical and Doping Commission member, Dr Herb Elliott, also noted that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and IAAF were also collaborating on a number of projects on the subject, including one at the Royal Caroline Institute in Sweden.

He discouraged the use of doping in sport, saying, “Doping Kills”, adding that the dangers or using anabolic steroids included developing liver, heart, and kidney disease as well as epilepsy.

“It’s one way of killing yourself by degrees,” Elliott said.
He added that in men, impotence and low sperm count were among the dangers, and mentioned the case of a female Bulgarian athlete who became pregnant while doping.
The child, he said, was now a virtual ‘vegetable’ needing to visit the hospital at least once per week.

“Young ladies, don’t take any foolishness it you wish to become a mother someday,” Elliott implored.

The JADCO Symposium was part funded by GraceKennedy and UNESCO and involved athletes and officials from all national sporting associations.

Keeping Pace with ACE: Are ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists Potential Doping Agents? (2008, Dec 1)

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000149 EndHTML:0000000489 StartFragment:0000000199 EndFragment:0000000455 StartSelection:0000000199 EndSelection:0000000455
Keeping Pace with ACE: Are ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists Potential Doping Agents?
Keeping Pace with ACE: Are ACE Inhibitors and Angi…[Sports Med. 2008] – PubMed Result <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19026021?dopt=Abstract>

Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1065-79. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838120-00008.

Related Articles <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=19026021&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Links

Keeping Pace with ACE: Are ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonists Potential Doping Agents?

Wang P <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Wang%20P%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Fedoruk MN <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Fedoruk%20MN%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> , Rupert JL <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term=%22Rupert%20JL%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract> .

School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

In the decade since the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene was first proposed to be a ‘human gene for physical performance’, there have been numerous studies examining the effects of ACE genotype on physical performance phenotypes such as aerobic capacity, muscle function, trainability, and athletic status. While the results are variable and sometimes inconsistent, and corroborating phenotypic data limited, carriers of the ACE ‘insertion’ allele (the presence of an alu repeat element in intron 16 of the gene) have been reported to have higher maximum oxygen uptake (V (2max)), greater response to training, and increased muscle efficiency when compared with individuals carrying the ‘deletion’ allele (absence of the alu repeat). Furthermore, the insertion allele has been reported to be over-represented in elite athletes from a variety of populations representing a number of endurance sports. The mechanism by which the ACE insertion genotype could potentiate physical performance is unknown. The presence of the ACE insertion allele has been associated with lower ACE activity (ACE(plasma)) in number of studies, suggesting that individuals with an innate tendency to have lower ACE levels respond better to training and are at an advantage in endurance sporting events. This could be due to lower levels of angiotensin II (the vasoconstrictor converted to active form by ACE), higher levels of bradykinin (a vasodilator degraded by ACE) or some combination of the two phenotypes. Observations that individuals carrying the ACE insertion allele (and presumably lower ACE(plasma)) have an enhanced response to training or are over-represented amongst elite athletes raises the intriguing question: would individuals with artificially lowered ACE(plasma) have similar training or performance potential? As there are a number of drugs (i.e. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists [angiotensin receptor blockers - ARBs]) that have the ability to either reduce ACE(plasma) activity or block the action of angiotensin II, the question is relevant to the study of ergogenic agents and to the efforts to rid sports of ‘doping’. This article discusses the possibility that ACE inhibitors and ARBs, by virtue of their effects on ACE or angiotensin II function, respectively, have performance-enhancing capabilities; it also reviews the data on the effects of these medications on V (2max), muscle composition and endurance capacity in patient and non-patient populations. We conclude that, while the direct evidence supporting the hypothesis that ACE-related medications are potential doping agents is not compelling, there are insufficient data on young, athletic populations to exclude the possibility, and there is ample, albeit indirect, support from genetic studies to suggest that they should be. Unfortunately, given the history of drug experimentation in athletes and the rapid appropriation of therapeutic agents into the doping arsenal, this indirect evidence, coupled with the availability of ACE-inhibiting and ACE-receptor blocking medications may be sufficiently tempting to unscrupulous competitors looking for a shortcut to the finish line.

WADA meeting to investigate gene doping in sport (2008, June 2)

WADA meeting to investigate gene doping in sport

The Associated Press
Published: June 2, 2008

The threat gene doping poses to the integrity of sport will be investigated next week ahead of the Beijing Olympics.
Anti-doping leaders and genetics experts will meet in St. Petersburg, Russia to hear details of new research and developments, as well as ongoing ethical concerns.

Gene doping is an illegal spinoff of gene therapy, which typically alters a person’s DNA to fight diseases like muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis.

The four-day Gene Doping Symposium, starting on Sunday, will be the World Anti-Doping Agency’s third such gathering since 2002.

Athletes May Try Unproved Muscular Dystrophy Drug for an Edge (2008, March 11)

Athletes May Try Unproved Muscular Dystrophy Drug for an Edge

By Curtis Eichelberger

<http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=photos&sid=ajKE6ZDs.iUI>
March 11 (Bloomberg) — Chris Rosa has spent 26 years in a wheelchair awaiting a treatment for his muscular dystrophy. Within the next five years, even before new drugs are approved for him, athletes may try using them to cheat, sports doping authorities and scientists say.

“I get angry about it,” said Dr. Se-Jin Lee, the Johns Hopkins University scientist who discovered a protein being developed for diseases including muscular dystrophy. “The scientific potential to make people’s lives vastly improved is incredible. And all we talk about is whether some athlete can use it to hit a baseball farther.”

Wyeth, Amgen Inc. and closely held Acceleron Pharma Inc. are experimenting with spurring muscle growth by suppressing a chemical called myostatin, found by Lee in 1997. Doing so would reverse atrophy caused by wasting illnesses and aging — and create a hard-to-detect, non-steroid shortcut for increasing the size of healthy tissues.

Agencies that police sports for performance-enhancing substances say myostatin blockers may reach athletes as soon as this year’s Olympics and certainly by 2012. The World Anti- Doping Agency <http://www.wada-ama.org/en/>  has banned them even before they have been fully tested. Meanwhile, that group and sports organizations including Major League Baseball are monitoring other treatments known as gene doping, in which cells are reprogrammed to enlarge muscles.

The Montreal-based anti-doping group, created in 1999, has already spent $6.5 million on finding ways to detect athletes using gene-altering technologies. The group plans to work with companies making myostatin inhibitors when trials are more advanced, according to Olivier Rabin, the agency’s science director.

Difficult to Detect

“We have to prepare ourselves for misuse in sport soon,” Rabin said in a telephone interview. Some athletes might try to use the new muscle-building medicines as soon as the 2012 Olympic Games in London, he said.

The new drugs may be particularly difficult to detect because they are injected directly into the targeted tissues and could be designed not to show up in urine and blood tests, researchers say.

As a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee probed the use of steroids in professional sports, witnesses at hearings in January and February warned that next-generation drugs may enable athletes to rewrite record books.

“When we think we have a problem solved, there are chemists creating new problems,” said Bud Selig <http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Bud+Selig&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1> , the commissioner of Major League Baseball, told the House panel Jan. 15. Baseball “hired the best experts that we can” on gene doping, he said. Selig didn’t address myostatin blockers.

Muscular Dystrophy Victim

Drugs to inhibit myostatin are being developed to help patients like Rosa, 40, who is the director of student affairs at City University of New York. He was diagnosed with muscular dystrophy at age 14. He remembers spending childhood summers playing stickball in the shadows of New York’s Shea Stadium and the winters emulating St. John’s basketball player Chris Mullin <http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Chris+Mullin&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1> .

“I can’t dream about my future without worrying about how this disease might skew my life expectancy,” Rosa says.

In healthy people, muscle mass is determined by need. As exercise tears fibers, the cells instruct the tissues to rebuild themselves bigger and stronger to handle increased workload.

Patients like Rosa lose muscle and never rebuild it. The same process affects people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also called Lou Gehrig <http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Lou+Gehrig&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1> ‘s disease, after the New York Yankees Hall of Fame baseball player whose career it ended. Others lose muscle as they age, affecting stability when walking.

In 1997, Lee at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore created mice lacking a gene to make the protein myostatin and showed that they developed more muscle. He and other scientists later showed that the substance regulates growth of the tissues. Michael Bloomberg, the majority owner of Bloomberg LP, is a former chairman of the Johns Hopkins board of trustees, and the university’s school of public health is named for him.

Wyeth, Amgen Trials

Wyeth <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=WYE%3AUS> , based in Madison, New Jersey, and Amgen <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=AMGN%3AUS> , based in Thousand Oaks, California, are testing myostatin blockers in humans. Neither company would discuss the drugs’ potential for abuse by athletes. “Amgen’s mission is to serve patients,” said spokeswoman Anne McNickle <http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Anne+McNickle&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1> .

Wyeth, the fifth-largest U.S. drugmaker, is developing MYO- 029, an antibody molecule that attaches specifically to myostatin and blocks the signal instructing muscles to stop growing. The results of an early study, with more than 100 patients in the U.S. and the U.K., will be published this year, said Michael Lampe, a Wyeth spokesman.

Amgen, the world’s largest biotechnology company, has started a safety trial for a myostatin blocker called AMG-745. McNickle declined to how say many patients are participating.

Acceleron, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, will begin safety trials this year for its myostatin treatment, ACE-031, said Steven Ertel, vice president of corporate development. Acceleron has reported that rodents given the substance had a 60 percent increase in muscle growth and primates, at least 10 percent.

Brazilian Bodybuilder

“What I care about are the 5-year-old children diagnosed with muscular dystrophy who will be in a wheelchair by 12 and oftentimes dead by their early 20s,” said John Knopf, Acceleron’s chief executive officer. “The focus here isn’t on athletes.”

Nonetheless, participants in sports are following the development of myostatin inhibitors. Lee, the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine molecular scientist, recalls putting down a test tube one day about two years ago to take a phone call from a Brazilian bodybuilder who had e-mailed for weeks with questions about the substances.

“I was explaining that we were still in the testing phases and that a drug Wyeth has in trials, and he interrupted me and said, `MYO-029?”’ Lee said during an interview at his laboratory. “He said, `I have some right here. I just want to know if it’s safe to take.”’

`Shocking Conversation’

“I warned him against taking something that hadn’t been thoroughly tested,” Lee said. “It was a shocking conversation.”

Geneticists Lee and Alexandra McPherron discovered myostatin when they were studying how cells send signals to each other. The material was one of the communicating molecules they identified. Lee later found that while the protein plays a predominant role in controlling muscle growth in mice, it is just one of many regulators in humans, and might not even be the most important, he says.

In Philadelphia, Dr. Lee Sweeney is developing a different, gene-based approach to increasing muscle mass. Sweeney, the chairman of the physiology department at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine, recalls watching his grandmother struggle with muscular atrophy in her final years, until she was unable to care for herself.

In the late 1990s, he injected mice with a synthetic gene that produced IGF-1, for insulin-like growth factor 1, and saw a 30 percent gain in muscle. Later, rodents were genetically engineered to overproduce IGF-1 in their skeletal muscle. These sedentary mice experienced increased muscle mass of as much as 50 percent. The substance instructs the tissues to grow.

`Had to Hang Up’

U.S. newspapers and magazines picked up on medical journal reports of his work, and football coaches started calling, Sweeney says. One offered his own athletes as test subjects.

“I kept telling them that my research had only been done on mice and that it could potentially kill a person,” Sweeney said. “I finally had to hang up on some of them.”

Sweeney’s research has graduated to dogs from mice. It’s a big step, because the dog’s immune system is more similar to that of a human, he says. Treatments that safely alter the muscle mass of a mouse might trigger a canine’s immune system to attack tissues injected with new genetic instructions.

That’s why the medicines aren’t yet safe enough for athletes or anyone else to try, Sweeney says. He worries that a rogue lab could be built for as little as $500,000 to turn out untested materials to meet athletes’ demands, he says.

“You have athletes out there who want to become champions so badly that they are willing to risk their health and their lives,” Sweeney says.

To contact the reporter on this story: Curtis Eichelberger <http://search.bloomberg.com/search?q=Curtis+Eichelberger&site=wnews&client=wnews&proxystylesheet=wnews&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&filter=p&getfields=wnnis&sort=date:D:S:d1>  in Washington at ceichelberge@bloomberg.net

Think performance enhancers are a problem now? Welcome to the era of the genetically engineered superathlete (2008, March 11)

Think performance enhancers are a problem now? Welcome to the era of the genetically engineered superathlete

Tuesday March 11, 2008 12:27PM

By David Epstein
I am one of the most avid sports fans you’ll find,” Se-Jin Lee says. It’s true. He’ll watch anything. Basketball. Football. Fútbol. Billiards on channel seven-hundred-whatever. As a graduate student in the ’80s Lee used to sit in his car in the driveway with the radio on to listen to the games of faraway baseball teams. Even now, in his lab at Johns Hopkins Medical School in Baltimore, he easily rattles off the NCAA basketball tournament winners in order from 1964 to 2007. And, like anyone who values fair competition these days, he’s disturbed by the issue of performance-enhancing drugs in sports….