Introduction
The subject of gene doping has given rise to a number of ethical discussions in sport [1] In 2002, the US President’s Council on Bioethics met twice to consider the way that genetic technology might be used to enhance athletic performance [2]. This paper provides an outline and response to the discussion that took place in the first of those meetings. The paper critiques the approach to gene doping emerging within sport policy, arguing that the broader context of genetics should prohibit the disqualification of genetically modified athletes from competition.

Methods
This paper uses methods of analytical philosophy to inquire into the values underpinning moral views on gene doping.

Results
The paper identifies three ethical views of sport (romantic, techno-centred, and entertainment) within the U.S. President’s Council’s discussion, which provide a basis for understanding the complex layers of issues related to the gene doping debate. The Council’s meeting is used as a basis for contextualising ethical discussions about genetics in broader society, from which it is argued that the debate for sport does not belong to sport.

Discussion / Conclusions
There are important ways in which anti-doping policy cannot remain marginal from other discussions about biotechnology. Moreover, the decisions made, if limited to a sporting context, have the potential to threaten individual liberties, the same values that are supposed to be protected through policy and enjoyed through freedom to participate in sport, regardless of one’s genetic composition. Any policy on gene doping must reflect this broader social context and recognise the capacity of people to choose different ways of living in society.

References

[2]. The U.S. President's Council on Bioethics (2002). Session 4: Enhancement 2: Potential for Genetic Enhancements in Sports. Washington, D.C., The President's Council on Bioethics.